Case Title: Hari Mohan vs Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd. The New Delhi branch of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission–X, composed of Monika Aggarwal Srivastava (President), Dr Rajender Dhar (Member), and Ritu Garodia (Member), has held Max Bupa Health Insurance Company responsible for unjustly denying a valid medical claim. The Commission observed that…

Order Name: Monika Bansal & Ors. v/s Total Environment Building Systems Pvt. Ltd. Here’s an important ruling that you need to be aware of if you’re planning on buying property. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has recently reinforced that it’s not fair to keep buyers waiting indefinitely for possession of their property. This came…

The Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-IV in Bengaluru, Karnataka, has come to a decision against Redbus, an online bus ticket booking platform. The judgment was delivered by the bench consisting of President Ramachandra M.S. and Member Nandini H Kumbhar. They found Redbus to be responsible for not providing adequate service by failing to inform…

Subject: District Consumer Commission Dismisses Complaint Against Northern Railways Over Stolen Belongings The New Delhi bench of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission–X has recently passed a verdict in a case concerning stolen items during a train journey. The bench, comprising Monika Aggarwal Srivastava (President), Dr. Rajender Dhar (Member), and Ritu Garodia (Member), made clear…

Order Name: District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Solan vs PNB Metlife LIC Ltd In a recent judgement by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Solan, Himachal Pradesh, a customer complaint against PNB Metlife LIC Ltd was dismissed. The commission, led by D.R. Thakur (President), Vijay Lamba (Member), and Neelam Gupta (Member), found that the…

Order Name: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission vs Ruchi Reality Holdings The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, under the stewardship of Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya, recently ruled that a homebuyer shouldn’t be expected to wait forever to take possession of a flat they’ve fully paid for. Here’s a quick run-through of the case details….

Article: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s Order on Force Majeure and Unfair Trade Practices In a recent ruling, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), under the leadership of AVM J. Rajendra, made it clear that developers cannot hide behind the force majeure clause and retain the buyer’s money without providing service. Such an…

The Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, in a recent ruling, held telecom giants BSNL and Mokeri Telephone Exchange accountable for their failure to provide satisfactory internet and telecom services. The commission asserted that a simple assurance of rent rebate during the period of faulty service does not exempt BSNL and Mokeri from their responsibility….

In a recent ruling by the Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), a hefty penalty of Rs. 50 lakhs has been levied on a real estate developer. The fine was imposed due to the builder’s failure to register their project as per the guidelines of Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act,…

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, under the lead of Justice Ram Surat Ram Maurya, clarified the limitations of its Revisional Jurisdiction. It explained that it only gets involved in certain situations, like when a State Commission has overstepped its powers or neglected to use them appropriately. The case at hand involved a couple who…