Consumer Forum Won’t Overlook Delays Without Valid Reasons: NCDRC Ruling

Order Name: Parsvnath Developers Limited Vs. Abhinav Sharma Case No.: A. E. . No. 8/2024 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) recently ruled against Parsvnath Developers in a case involving an appeal delay. The NCDRC bench, consisting of Subhash Chandra and Sadhna Shanker, stated that any request for delay condonation can’t be approved without…

Read More

New India Assurance Found Accountable for Service Shortfall by NCDRC

Order Date: Not Specified Order Name: M/S. Aaditya International Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Case No.: F.A. No. 694/2017 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Justice Ram Surat Maurya and Mr. Bharatkumar Pandya, has ruled that insurance companies cannot change policy coverage during renewal without the policyholder’s consent. ### Case Summary Aaditya…

Read More

Bihar State Commission Instructs TATA AIG Life Insurance to Pay Out Despite Pre-existing Condition Not Linked to Death

Order Name: State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar vs TATA AIG Life Insurance Company In a recent judgment by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bihar, headed by Justice Sanjay Kumar, with members Shamim Akhtar and Ram Prawesh Das, an earlier decision by the District Commission, Vaishali was upheld. The case revolved around TATA AIG…

Read More

Insurer’s Agent Should Be Viewed as the Employer, Mandating the Safeguarding of the Life Assured’s Interests: NCDRC

Order Name: Life Insurance Corporation Of India Vs. Pittala Pochamma Case No.: R. P. No. 1058/2017 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Justice Sudip Ahluwalia, recently made a decision that implicates both the Life India Corporation and the employer of an insured individual. They were found deficient in service as they denied an…

Read More

NCDRC: Commission Lacks Authority to Resolve Disputed Factual Issues

Order Name: Post Office Vs. Ramesh Chand Bhatia Case No.: R.P. No. 1608/2019 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), under the leadership of Mr. Binoy Kumar, recently made a significant ruling. The Commission reiterated that its proceedings, due to their summary nature, are not suited for cases involving highly disputed facts or allegations of…

Read More

New Delhi District Commission Rules Passengers Must Ensure Own Baggage Safety on Trains Unless Railway’s Fault is Demonstrated, Northern Railway Complaint Dismissed

Subject: District Consumer Commission Dismisses Complaint Against Northern Railways Over Stolen Belongings The New Delhi bench of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission–X has recently passed a verdict in a case concerning stolen items during a train journey. The bench, comprising Monika Aggarwal Srivastava (President), Dr. Rajender Dhar (Member), and Ritu Garodia (Member), made clear…

Read More

New Delhi Institute Of Management Studies Found Guilty Of Deceiving Student Into Enrolling In MBA Program

Order Date: 23rd July 2024 Order Name: New Delhi Institute of Management Studies vs Shamaneshwaram and 2 Ors. Case No.: Revision Petition No. 346-347 of 2019 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) bench, led by Dr. Inder Jit Singh (Presiding Member), has held the New Delhi Institute of Management Studies (NDIMS) accountable for misleading…

Read More

NCDRC Rules Public Charitable Trusts Are Not Individuals Under Consumer Protection Law

Order Name: Anchrom Lab Supplies & Anr Vs. Aryavaidyasala Case No.: F.A. No. 1429/2017 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Dr. Sadhna Shanker, ruled that a public charitable trust does not qualify as a “person” under the Consumer Protection Act. Consequently, such trusts cannot file consumer complaints. ### Key Facts A charitable trust…

Read More

NCDRC Identifies Unjust Trade Practices in Excessive Forfeiture and Service Tax Deductions

Order Name: Macrotech Developers Ltd. Vs. A. Syamala Reddy Case No.: F.A. No. 422/2023 The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, led by Mr. Subhash Chandra and Dr. Sadhna Shanker, has issued a significant ruling regarding the forfeiture of deposits by builders. The Commission emphasized that any forfeiture must be reasonable and should not exceed 10%…

Read More
×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

×